Thinking about OpenID , the next step is obviously a way to integrate trust into an identity. The first question people will want to ask, I believe, is, "Is this person a spammer?" (Insert your own definition for spammer here, but typically this will mean "Will this person use this site/application/service for the originally intended purpose and will abide by the policies and rules of the site/application/serivce?") Now that it seems like everyone is getting on board with OpenID (AOL, digg, Technorati, LiveJournal, even Microsoft), there are a lot of identities swimming around. This is a Good Thing. However, nothing stops a spammer or Bad Guy from creating their own OpenID. This is also a Good Thing, because OpenID is only there to verify the identity. Other technologies and layers are then free to add in Trust. There's a lot of built up trust information out on the web if we can just get to it. Think about all the hard earned feedback profiles and rankin